In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act, George Orwell

Indignez-vous ! Stéphane Hessel

“Le courage c’est de chercher la vérité et de la dire ; c’est de ne pas subir la loi du mensonge triomphant qui passe, et de ne pas faire écho, de notre âme, de notre bouche et de nos mains aux applaudissements imbéciles et aux huées fanatiques ”.” – Djordje Kuzmanovic




lundi 26 mai 2014

Desinformatiya- NOT to serve and protect


 In the wake of the recent killings in Belgium, it is beyond comprehension as why there isn't any more information on the killers, professional it seems as they used a military assault field, AK 47 and shot their victims in the head or neck.   Simply put, the public is being kept in the dark over this. 
  
À la suite des récents massacres en Belgique, ça dépasse l'entendement de la raison pour laquelle il n'existe pas plus d'informations sur les assassins, professionnels il semble car qu'ils ont utilisé un fusil d'assaut militaire, AK 47 et abattu leurs victimes dans la tête ou du cou. Autrement dit, la population est maintenue dans l'obscurité totale.
 
 Call me old-fashioned but I thought that the purpose of the police is assist, protect and inform the general public in order to:reassure them and also use the public to  locate and apprend the criminal perps!

 Mais j'ai  TOUJOURS pensé que le but de la police est d'aider, protéger et informer le grand public afin de : rassurer et aussi d'utiliser le public pour localiser et capturer le criminelle !
A follow blogger wrote a very pertinent comment about this so please take some time to read it:


Un blogueur de suivre a écrit un commentaire très pertinent sur ce alors s'il vous plaît, prenez quelques temps pour le lire :

S'il y a un autre meurtre en Belgique, le gouvernement et les médias sont criminels comploteurs.
 
The entire point of a government, security services and media is to protect and inform the public. The fact is that two men went into a museum and arbitrarily shot people to death. The fact that the museum was a Jewish one is largely irrelevant as the people they shot could have been anyone. The media not only did not give a description of the attackers, even once it was known that both of them were still at large and very likely on their way to another target, but covered for whatever government agency denied the information.

Le point entier d'un gouvernement, des services de sécurité et les médias est de protéger et informer le public. Le fait est que les deux hommes sont allés dans un musée et tiré arbitrairement les gens à mort. Le fait que le Musée était un juif est largement hors de propos que les gens qu'ils ont abattu aurait pu être n'importe qui. Les médias non seulement ne donnent pas une description des assaillants, encore une fois on savait que deux d'entre eux étaient toujours en fuite et très probable en train de se dirigés vers une autre cible, [mais couvert] pendant quelque Agence gouvernementale a nié l'information.
  Read this excerpt from one of the eye witnesses:
An antique-shop owner, who saw the killer and made eye contact with him as he walked away through the centre of the touristic district, said he was impassive and cold after the murders.
“I caught his eye. There was no expression whatsoever on his face.”

Lisez cet extrait d'un des témoins oculaires :

Un propriétaire de boutique antique, qui a vu le tueur et fait un contact visuel avec lui, car il s'éloigna à travers le centre du quartier touristique, dit qu'il était impassible et froid après les meurtres.

"J'ai attiré son attention. Il n'y n'avait aucune expression sur son visage. »
 
 Furthermore, no one, and I mean no one, would spend good money on a security system that just gave fuzzy stills of someone’s hat. They have photos and videos of the perp I am certain, which are better than what we saw. I don’t think they even make cameras that bad any more. And it was repeatedly stated that there were eye witnesses but no one thought to ask them for a description of the perp and none of the news agencies, not BBC or CNN even mentioned that there was no description of the mass murders currently at large in Belgian streets.

En outre, nul et je veux dire nul, dépenserait beaucoup d'argent sur un système de sécurité qui a donné des alambics floues de chapeau de quelqu'un. Ils ont des photos et vidéos du criminelle,  je suis certain, qui sont meilleurs que ce que nous avons vu. Je ne pense pas même qu'ils font des caméras si mal aujourd’hui. Et il a été dit à plusieurs reprises qu'il y avait des témoins oculaires, mais personne ne pensait de leur demander pour obtenir une description de la' perp' et aucun d'entre les agences de presse, ni la BBC ni CNN même mentionné qu'il n'existe pas aucune description des assassinats actuellement en liberté dans les rues belges.
 
An omission that is too large and across too many organizations to be accidental. This has to be policy.
 
Une omission qui est trop grand et  a travers de trop d'organisations pour être accidentelle. Ce doit être une politique.
 
 So I ask the public. What is the point of having a government who deliberately misinforms you in order to protect the image of exceptionally bad policy they are too afraid to back down from, or a security service more concerned about the reputation of the ideology that motivated the attack than they are of preventing another one, and a mass media who work three shifts to avoid informing the public on matters that are quite literally life and death.
 
Donc, je demande au public. Quel est l'intérêt d'avoir un gouvernement qui vous désinforment délibérément afin de protéger l'image de la politique exceptionnellement défavorables, de qu'ils ont trop peur de redescendre ou d'un service de sécurité plus préoccupé par la réputation de l'idéologie qui a motivé l'attaque qu'ils sont d'empêcher un autre et un média de masse qui travaillent les trois quarts de travail afin d'éviter d'informer le public sur les questions qui sont littéralement la vie et la mort.
 
 The time to learn basics about information, logic, reason and responsibility of these agencies is surely here. We as the public need to inform each other, and assist each other in understanding what criteria is for actual information. Because at the moment we do not have a news media. We have general anesthésia.

Le temps d'apprendre les notions de base sur les informations, de logique, de raison et de la responsabilité de ces agences est sûrement ici. Comme le public il faut s'informer mutuellement et prêtent mutuellement assistance pour comprendre quels sont les critères sont des informations réelles. Car pour le moment, nous n'avons pas un média. Nous avons anesthésia général.

signé

Bourriquet pour Vlad.

signed
Eeyore for Vlad.

Article: Les Crises Synthesis of the crisis in Ukraine 2 - The Coup



The fascist government of Kiev which we support

Part 2 - The Coup

21 May 2014


The movement then swelled up, with a record of 500 000 demonstrators on the 1st of december, the day when the first riots broke out.

This movement comprised of 3 political branches, (allied for 2 years) : the right wing “Motherland Party” headed by Yulia Tymochenko (based on a Thatcherite model), the liberal party “Udar” (strike), of Vitali Klitschko, (embraced by the German press as “our man in Kiev and supported by Angela Merkel), and the neo-nazi party “Svoboba”, headed by Oleg Tiagnybok, of which will discussed later. So, it wasn’t essentially a left-wing movement.   Look at this student demonstration “Pro-EU” in Lviv, (a stronghold of nationalist fascism). (Video Link).
 
Les étudiants d'EuroMaïdan à Lviv - 01-12-2013... par les-crises


Then the movement lasted, with a few tens of thousands of regular protesters occupying the place.






Let’s reiterate it: probably 90% of the demonstrators were peaceful, democrats, anti-oligarchs, anti-corruption and pro-Europeans. (The sequence of events will show at what point they were deceived...).

To note, however that this does not give them the right: in a democracy (as was Ukraine), it is the vote and not the street who decides the fundamental choices. Let’s underline that the EU also was to sign an association agreement with Ukraine (and Georgia...) without its citizens being consulted.


Thus, this beautiful movement had finally attracted fewer people than the «Manif for all» or the protests against the pension reform of Nicolas Sarkozy...

And given that these two French movements did not obtain what they wanted - and less still the departure of the President-, it is because they lacked the "local specialty" of Maidan: "self-defense" militias that emerged pretty quickly in December - which were fascist paramilitary militias, whose thousands of members regularly confronted the forces of law & order.






 The situation changes on 18 February, where they opened fire on the police, who had near 10 gunshot deaths on this single day, forcing the Government to allow the firing of live ammunition in "self-defence against the militia" – it is obviously forbidden for the police to shoot unarmed civilians!
Events tip into in bloodshed on 20 February. There are more than 100 deaths among the protesters - most killed by snipers whose origin seems very suspicious, (as noted by an Estonian Minister off the record with Catherine Ashton or a great report by the German TV ARD), it was revealed in mid-May that most fatal bullets were not from the police forces and that most of the evidence (weapons, bullets, spent cartridges, documents) had been lost or stolen. (Source). At this stage of manipulation, it is almost certain that putschists snipers fired on the security forces and unarmed protesters, and are responsible for much of the deaths incurred.

 http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1qnu74_ard-qui-est-responsable-du-carnage-de-maidan-11-04-2014_webcam?start=3

[…  In orignal 11 phots of Maidan violence and gunmen]

maidan euromaidan kiev ukraine protester manifestants fascistes néonazis nazis





maidan euromaidan kiev ukraine protester manifestants fascistes néonazis nazis





maidan euromaidan kiev ukraine protester manifestants fascistes néonazis nazis




maidan euromaidan kiev ukraine protester manifestants fascistes néonazis nazis

 maidan euromaidan kiev ukraine protester manifestants fascistes néonazis nazis


Let's face it that it becomes hard for a democracy to defend itself against such an individual (gas mask + shield + bulletproof vest...): 




 At police level, the official death toll was announced in mid-May: "1127 police and gendarmes suffered bodily injuries. From this total, 196 received injuries by firearms, 17 gendarmes and police officers were killed. At the time when the gendarmes and the police were wounded, they had not been wearing their service weapons." (Source)

 

At the same time, many abuses took place in the country - as here against Rostislav Vasilko, the general Secretary of the Communist Party in Lviv, beaten and tortured by the crowd (the extremist Catholic and Orthodox priests also played a significant role in these events):


On 21 February an agreement was signed between the President and the opposition, providing for early elections and a Government of national unity - all with the signing of several European Ministers to guarantee it (Germany, France, Poland).




But the Maidan militias refused the agreement. The coup succeeded, President Yanukovytch (whose life was under threat) fled the country on 22February. He was deposed unconstitutionally by the Assembly which called on 27 February a new interim President and a new Government, led by Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
 

Alexandre Turtchinov - Acting President, John Kerry, Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk
 
lt (the interim gov) is perfectly consistent with what the U.S. Government wanted, since there is the hpone call intercept with Victoria Nuland defining it (where we find her grandiose Fuck the EU):
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-kbw00aqqc
The Western powers eventually refused to demand the application of the agreement of 21 February, and to recognize it.


PART 3 - The fascist government